White Americans are a minority in 11 US states and will be a minority in at least 5 more before the next census. But nowhere in government is there a department of White minority affairs.
As a White Male American, I am a fourth class citizen behind non-Whites, sexual deviants and women of all races.
Usonia was never a nation in the traditional sense.
Blacks arriving since the very beginning meant that the equation of a nation "natus" (born from) didn't hold true to its meaning since then.
The USA was born as an empire, first as a en empire with african subjects, then with african and indian subjects, and then extending to other ethnicities globally both by importing them and conquering them (Puerto Rico, Guam, etc)
The only reason why many thought and still think that it was a nation at all ever, is because of the vast geographical space and the deliberate policy choice to separate (both physically and mentally) the euro-americans from everyone else. But even this Potempkin-nationalism was still just a lie.
Now is more obvious that is a multi-national, multi-ethnic global empire, which has always been formally the case (Washington saw the Indians as being their own nations), but is now just very blatant.
Why usonians loved its "nation" then and are dissilusioned now? because before the explotation and harsh conditions fell squarely on the blacks, or the chinese who built the railroads, etc, and since the 1960s, that same exploitation started to be targeted also at euro-americans, but even in this, the reasoning was the same, imperial and capitalistic expansion.
Anywho, good riddance, may God replace the USA chimerical, epstein-class ridden empire with something less malevolent.
I am not woke. I am a Monarchist, against abortion, and Catholic.
Is just that you are too deeply immersed in the intergenerational propaganda of your own empire to see its lies.
Another reason why the USA was never a traditional nation (since the very beginning) is that adopted the woke heresy of religious indifferentism. The 1st amendment caused many disparage and even opposite peoples to be sucked into the USA meatgrinder. But an organic nation has 1 religion. Ethnos is generally accompanied by it. Even amongst Europeans, the exclusivity of 1 religion makes for a powerful way of unifying all within the nation.
Anywho, the USA was an imperial project from the very start, specifically, a freemasonic experiment to make a novus ordo seclorum. A new world order. This is the idea since the very beginning.
May God dispose of that satanic empire and replace it with something less wicked.
I get what you’re saying to an extent , but the USA and “white” is what we have here in the USA, so that’s what we’re defending and rallying around. Those of us who trace our ancestry to the founding (such as myself) had little choice in “empire” which does not have a set definition anyways. The truth is that future historians will see the USA as one of the most weird and benign empires, not “the great Satan” as you put it.
We USA whites are circling the wagons in a prison yard with an increasing, hostile, foreign inmate population. That’s what we’re addressing. I’ve dealt with California Latinos my entire life and they’re increasingly joining or at least allying with us for various reasons, because they live here and understand the situation in ways you , a foreign Latino do not. If you lived here you’d clique up with us 100% for your own survival , especially with your worldviews .
Empire does have a set definition, is in the word itself.
Empire comes from Imperare, to impose (if memory serves), so, when you force another tribe to do as you wish, that's an empire.
The USA fits that definition since the very beginning via slavery (a hallmark of empires) and since they did what they wanted (usually psychopathic destruction) to the native nations.
The idea of USA as a satanic regime comes from Pope Leo XIII, who called freemasonry the synagogue of satan. That is the magisterial catholic definition of it within Catholicism.
Now, it is a fact that Washington was a freemason, as well as many other of his cronies, they even did a satanic ritual with the cornerstone of the capital when they founded it.
Even by self preservation standards is a satanic place, murdering hundreds of thousands of white babies since 1973 via roe v wade. Is a tyrannical place.
The USA is not a riddle, an special incomprehensible place only understood by those living in it, it is a rather vulgar place, but entirely knowable from afar.
As far as foreigners being hostile, congrats, another rotten fruit of a satanic empire. Bomb people and then import them (both by the hands of your satanic slaveowners) and you get what you get.
Specially after Trump cqme out in support of the livestreamed genocide in gaza, I realized that the whole project is a satanic force with no way to correct or reform, if God has mercy to humanity, it will go the way if the USSR, to complete state dissolution. May that be the merciful wish of Jesus Christ.
“The USA is not a riddle, a special incomprehensible place only understood by those living in it, it is a rather vulgar place, but entirely knowable from afar.”
This isn’t true, this is obnoxious foreign hubris .
Your definition of “empire” is not universal, by this definition almost any nation state could be considered an “empire” and slavery is so common in human history singling out the USA is absurd.
The Catholic Churches dislike Freemasons because the organized as a trade union to demand better pay building cathedrals, which the Catholics church did not want. Hence it’s weird secrecy.
Yes the founding fathers were free masons, they were Protestants and designed a limited government for British Protestant population that was rural and independent. They were not satanic and they were not monsters.
I mean, the USA is just an empire, just like other empires, if anything, the only special feature is that is a crypto-empire, an empire saying its a democracy/republic, but even in that the Roman Empire preceded it.
Again, to imagine that the USA is this beautiful, precious, incomprehensible, inefable thing, is precisely just the result of intergenerational propaganda.
The USA is a simple-ish place, with vulgar dispositions, intentions and systems. Part of its simplicity comes from its direct rejection of aristocracy, inequality, monarchy and other forms of anti-majoritarian systems.
You are probably misunderstanding "understand the USA" with "supporting the USA" as if, if I were to understand it, then I would love it and champion its success. If we go by that notion, even half of the white anglosaxon usonians don't "understand" the USA according to you, which is, funnily enough, a constant meme spread in Fox News "the libtards don't love this country because they don't understand it" but nah, is possible to understand the USA and hate it, and to hate it precisely because you understand it is even more possible in my estimation.
No definition is universal, not even words themselves, who tend to be local. But, as a broad definition, respecting the etymology of the word is a very standard widely accepted notion for any definition. If there is dispute on what the color blue means, then the etymology will be a solid starting point.
Most countries can't qualify as empires because most countries only counted as part of their tribe their own tribesmen, so if there were a different tribe in "their" territory, it was seen as an external force they were fighting. And if they won and made them slaves, yes, that is similar to an empire, but most countries were not powerful enough to do that shift. And specially to solidify that status quo for decades.
Empires tend to absorb and subjugate distinct foreign races and tribes for their own gain, which is what the USA started doing.
As far as the accursed freemasons go, I'll go by the words of Christ "By their fruits you shall know them" which in the case of freemasons, is a lot of cursed and diabolical stuff, but if you don't agree, that's that, we are divided on dogmatic lines on that and other points.
Freemasons are certainly monsters, and washington and their cronies shared in that accursed system.
For instance, in one of the degrees of freemasonry there is ritual sodomy... so,....
The whole entire point of the articles of confederation was to openly acknowledge that we were NOT a single united nation, but would benefit from lose cooperation under a weak federation. Our ACTUAL founding, was predicated on the fact that we were NOT a single people or nation.
Illegally. It needed unanimous consent of ALL states in order to be changed. This was never achieved. Madison admits the Philadelphia constitution was Illegal but needed in federalist 40. The whole constitution, as we know it, was an abortion of the founders intent.
Exactly, proving my point. An empire since the very beginning.
Empires tend to subjugate portions of the territory whenever they are making problems, so, they turn tyrannical on a dime, which is what it occured between the north and the south.
But that's the thing. This anglomasonic experiment, of doing an experimental empire, wouldn't had lasted by pure voluntary efforts, coercion and force was always necessary, either for slavery, for ethnic cleansing (trail of tears) or the subjugatio of the southeners.
You can't maintain a bunch of different races and ethnicities together by pure persuasion, is just not possible.
Great read Adam. Learned a lot from the breakdown of your four historical examples. A lot to chew on in there, your reads always challenge me to think deeper!
I still have excitement about Independence Day. At least Trump has somewhat delayed the inevitable; lord willing and the creek don’t rise, we will have figured out how to balkanize and survive our fate.
White Americans are a minority in 11 US states and will be a minority in at least 5 more before the next census. But nowhere in government is there a department of White minority affairs.
As a White Male American, I am a fourth class citizen behind non-Whites, sexual deviants and women of all races.
What's to celebrate?
"Identity politics for me, but not for thee" has been the status quo, but that system cannot hold.
Usonia was never a nation in the traditional sense.
Blacks arriving since the very beginning meant that the equation of a nation "natus" (born from) didn't hold true to its meaning since then.
The USA was born as an empire, first as a en empire with african subjects, then with african and indian subjects, and then extending to other ethnicities globally both by importing them and conquering them (Puerto Rico, Guam, etc)
The only reason why many thought and still think that it was a nation at all ever, is because of the vast geographical space and the deliberate policy choice to separate (both physically and mentally) the euro-americans from everyone else. But even this Potempkin-nationalism was still just a lie.
Now is more obvious that is a multi-national, multi-ethnic global empire, which has always been formally the case (Washington saw the Indians as being their own nations), but is now just very blatant.
Why usonians loved its "nation" then and are dissilusioned now? because before the explotation and harsh conditions fell squarely on the blacks, or the chinese who built the railroads, etc, and since the 1960s, that same exploitation started to be targeted also at euro-americans, but even in this, the reasoning was the same, imperial and capitalistic expansion.
Anywho, good riddance, may God replace the USA chimerical, epstein-class ridden empire with something less malevolent.
Ahistorical woke nonsense. America was a nation up until ww2 or so, after that it became an official empire.
I am not woke. I am a Monarchist, against abortion, and Catholic.
Is just that you are too deeply immersed in the intergenerational propaganda of your own empire to see its lies.
Another reason why the USA was never a traditional nation (since the very beginning) is that adopted the woke heresy of religious indifferentism. The 1st amendment caused many disparage and even opposite peoples to be sucked into the USA meatgrinder. But an organic nation has 1 religion. Ethnos is generally accompanied by it. Even amongst Europeans, the exclusivity of 1 religion makes for a powerful way of unifying all within the nation.
Anywho, the USA was an imperial project from the very start, specifically, a freemasonic experiment to make a novus ordo seclorum. A new world order. This is the idea since the very beginning.
May God dispose of that satanic empire and replace it with something less wicked.
I get what you’re saying to an extent , but the USA and “white” is what we have here in the USA, so that’s what we’re defending and rallying around. Those of us who trace our ancestry to the founding (such as myself) had little choice in “empire” which does not have a set definition anyways. The truth is that future historians will see the USA as one of the most weird and benign empires, not “the great Satan” as you put it.
We USA whites are circling the wagons in a prison yard with an increasing, hostile, foreign inmate population. That’s what we’re addressing. I’ve dealt with California Latinos my entire life and they’re increasingly joining or at least allying with us for various reasons, because they live here and understand the situation in ways you , a foreign Latino do not. If you lived here you’d clique up with us 100% for your own survival , especially with your worldviews .
Empire does have a set definition, is in the word itself.
Empire comes from Imperare, to impose (if memory serves), so, when you force another tribe to do as you wish, that's an empire.
The USA fits that definition since the very beginning via slavery (a hallmark of empires) and since they did what they wanted (usually psychopathic destruction) to the native nations.
The idea of USA as a satanic regime comes from Pope Leo XIII, who called freemasonry the synagogue of satan. That is the magisterial catholic definition of it within Catholicism.
Now, it is a fact that Washington was a freemason, as well as many other of his cronies, they even did a satanic ritual with the cornerstone of the capital when they founded it.
Even by self preservation standards is a satanic place, murdering hundreds of thousands of white babies since 1973 via roe v wade. Is a tyrannical place.
The USA is not a riddle, an special incomprehensible place only understood by those living in it, it is a rather vulgar place, but entirely knowable from afar.
As far as foreigners being hostile, congrats, another rotten fruit of a satanic empire. Bomb people and then import them (both by the hands of your satanic slaveowners) and you get what you get.
Specially after Trump cqme out in support of the livestreamed genocide in gaza, I realized that the whole project is a satanic force with no way to correct or reform, if God has mercy to humanity, it will go the way if the USSR, to complete state dissolution. May that be the merciful wish of Jesus Christ.
“The USA is not a riddle, a special incomprehensible place only understood by those living in it, it is a rather vulgar place, but entirely knowable from afar.”
This isn’t true, this is obnoxious foreign hubris .
Your definition of “empire” is not universal, by this definition almost any nation state could be considered an “empire” and slavery is so common in human history singling out the USA is absurd.
The Catholic Churches dislike Freemasons because the organized as a trade union to demand better pay building cathedrals, which the Catholics church did not want. Hence it’s weird secrecy.
Yes the founding fathers were free masons, they were Protestants and designed a limited government for British Protestant population that was rural and independent. They were not satanic and they were not monsters.
I mean, the USA is just an empire, just like other empires, if anything, the only special feature is that is a crypto-empire, an empire saying its a democracy/republic, but even in that the Roman Empire preceded it.
Again, to imagine that the USA is this beautiful, precious, incomprehensible, inefable thing, is precisely just the result of intergenerational propaganda.
The USA is a simple-ish place, with vulgar dispositions, intentions and systems. Part of its simplicity comes from its direct rejection of aristocracy, inequality, monarchy and other forms of anti-majoritarian systems.
You are probably misunderstanding "understand the USA" with "supporting the USA" as if, if I were to understand it, then I would love it and champion its success. If we go by that notion, even half of the white anglosaxon usonians don't "understand" the USA according to you, which is, funnily enough, a constant meme spread in Fox News "the libtards don't love this country because they don't understand it" but nah, is possible to understand the USA and hate it, and to hate it precisely because you understand it is even more possible in my estimation.
No definition is universal, not even words themselves, who tend to be local. But, as a broad definition, respecting the etymology of the word is a very standard widely accepted notion for any definition. If there is dispute on what the color blue means, then the etymology will be a solid starting point.
Most countries can't qualify as empires because most countries only counted as part of their tribe their own tribesmen, so if there were a different tribe in "their" territory, it was seen as an external force they were fighting. And if they won and made them slaves, yes, that is similar to an empire, but most countries were not powerful enough to do that shift. And specially to solidify that status quo for decades.
Empires tend to absorb and subjugate distinct foreign races and tribes for their own gain, which is what the USA started doing.
As far as the accursed freemasons go, I'll go by the words of Christ "By their fruits you shall know them" which in the case of freemasons, is a lot of cursed and diabolical stuff, but if you don't agree, that's that, we are divided on dogmatic lines on that and other points.
Freemasons are certainly monsters, and washington and their cronies shared in that accursed system.
For instance, in one of the degrees of freemasonry there is ritual sodomy... so,....
an accursed system, sons of satan.
As Pope Leo XIII said, "the synagogue of Satan"
The whole entire point of the articles of confederation was to openly acknowledge that we were NOT a single united nation, but would benefit from lose cooperation under a weak federation. Our ACTUAL founding, was predicated on the fact that we were NOT a single people or nation.
Yes, and then the US constitution was created defining us more clearly as a nation.
Illegally. It needed unanimous consent of ALL states in order to be changed. This was never achieved. Madison admits the Philadelphia constitution was Illegal but needed in federalist 40. The whole constitution, as we know it, was an abortion of the founders intent.
Exactly, proving my point. An empire since the very beginning.
Empires tend to subjugate portions of the territory whenever they are making problems, so, they turn tyrannical on a dime, which is what it occured between the north and the south.
But that's the thing. This anglomasonic experiment, of doing an experimental empire, wouldn't had lasted by pure voluntary efforts, coercion and force was always necessary, either for slavery, for ethnic cleansing (trail of tears) or the subjugatio of the southeners.
You can't maintain a bunch of different races and ethnicities together by pure persuasion, is just not possible.
“You can't maintain a bunch of different races and ethnicities together by pure persuasion, is just not possible.”
The most correct thing you’ve said so far.
Great read Adam. Learned a lot from the breakdown of your four historical examples. A lot to chew on in there, your reads always challenge me to think deeper!
I still have excitement about Independence Day. At least Trump has somewhat delayed the inevitable; lord willing and the creek don’t rise, we will have figured out how to balkanize and survive our fate.